Showing posts with label Ben Affleck. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ben Affleck. Show all posts

Thursday, September 2, 2010

The Town

Is Ben Affleck the most underrated man in Hollywood? With every passing film he makes, it seems more and more true. The man won an Oscar for writing, has reinvented his acting career the last half decade, and has now become a serious director. Affleck made a string of bad decisions in the early years of the last decade, and it has haunted his career ever since. While his latest directing/acting job won't wash away that ill will for most, it is still another solid step in the right direction. The Town may not be the most original movie (or title), but it is such a solid example of the genre that it's worth watching.

Affleck stars as career criminal Doug MacRay. Doug, along with a collection of lowlife childhood friends, robs banks. After their latest job they kidnap the manager of the bank (Rebecca Hall) in order to make a getaway. They let her go soon after, but she is very shaken by the experience. When they realize that she lives a few blocks away from their usual haunts, Doug decides to approach her to see if she can ID any of them. While she doesn't recognize him, he sees how affected she is by what they put her through. He begins to regret his actions, and she starts to fall in love with the man he pretends to be. The film follows Doug as he tries to balance his old life as a criminal, and the new life he wishes he could live.

Like I said, this is a film you've probably seen before. What makes it pop in spite of that familiarity is the acting and the visual storytelling on display. Affleck is very good as a man split between loyalty to his lifelong friends and his desire for a greater life. He allows a bitter anger to boil under the surface for so long, that whenever it bursts out, it is both shocking yet not really unexpected. The real standout, though, is Jeremy Renner as Affleck's increasingly disturbed best friend. Locked away for nine years for murder, he feels the world owes him something in return for the life he lost. With his grip on reality fading as the film progresses, you both hate him and sympathize with him. And then there is Jon Hamm as the man trying to take these boys down. It is a thankless role, but he makes it his own. He delivers exposition and banters with his partner like a champ, but we never really care about him. When will Jon Hamm get the vehicle he deserves? The man has the charisma and charm of George Clooney, and seems destined to be the next big movie star. The Town doesn't solidify that fact for him, but it seems to be only a matter of time.

Visually, Affleck seems to have grown since Gone Baby Gone. Where as that film had an often flat visual style, he takes some risks in The Town that pay off. One great little touch is the way in which he matches an early shot of a flashback of Renner murdering his best friend with another shot later of him arguing with Affleck. It creates a sudden sense of dread that hits you unexpectedly, making the stakes seem higher than they otherwise would. And the heist scenes, especially the climactic one, are electric. While they often seem to take a page from Point Break (the masks, most notably), they are still thrilling. You get the sense that anything could go wrong at a moment's notice, and the film could take a sudden turn into dark, unexpected territory.

I really just wish that all the pieces had been in support of a stronger story. After Gone Baby Gone, which had an air of importance and originality, this just doesn't feel like a step forward for Affleck as a director. And yet Affleck's visual sense is arguably stronger here than it was there. Ultimately it's a good deal of fun, which can never be argued with, and all the performances are as strong as one could hope for. The Town may feel like a place you've been before, but you won't mind going there again.

Saturday, November 10, 2007

Catching Up: Mini Reviews

As Oscar season quickly approaches, my movie intake is increasing. I simply don't have the time to give all the movies the reviews they deserve, but I still felt I should sum up my feelings towards each.

Gone Baby Gone



Following in the footsteps of Clint Eastwood with Mystic River, actor Ben Affleck has crafted a masterpiece of moral ambiguity. Based on a Denis Lehane novel, Baby follows two private detectives (Casey Affleck and Michelle Monaghan) in search of a missing four year old girl. The plot unfolds in a surprising way, and it's a testament to Ben Affleck's directing abilities that he is able to keep it from feeling exploitative or familiar. At one point I honestly had no idea where the film was going to go next, a quality I wish more films had. All the performances are excellent, with Casey Affleck once again proving he is ready for the big time. Ed Harris as a morally ambiguous cop and relative newcomer Amy Ryan as the mother of the missing child give the best performances, however, and it would be truly surprising to not see at least one of them (probably Ryan) get an Oscar nomination. It all builds to one of the most thought provoking finales of the year, with a final shot that is a bit devastating. If this is the career Ben Affleck has in his future, I welcome it with open arms.




Bee Movie


There really is only one reason to see Bee Movie: Jerry Seinfeld. It's been almost a decade since his hit sitcom went off the air, and he has finally made the leap to the big screen (Comedian notwithstanding). If you were to remove Seinfeld's humor, though, this would be just another Dreamworks animated comedy, which is to say, not a very good movie. Yet Jerry brings enough wit and charm to raise this above the Shreks and Shark Tales and deliver an occasionally very funny film. The supporting cast is unfortunately largely wasted, especially Chris Rock, whose presence here amounts to maybe three scenes. Seinfeld definitely still knows how to make you laugh, though, and that's really all I expected from this to begin with.




American Gangster


With American Gangster Ridley Scott appears to have watched every major gangster film of the past 40 years, and then proceeded to copy them all. The result is one of the least original films of the fall season. Which isn't to say it's a bad movie. You've seen literally everything in this film before, but it's done with such precision here that it barely receives a pass. Denzel Washington is up to his usual tricks as Frank Lucas, a gangster on the rise, while Russel Crowe is satisfying as the cop out to catch Lucas. The best scene in the film is when these two men finally sit down to talk with each other (shades of Heat), which unfortunately doesn't come until over two hours into this epic. Don't go into this expecting anything new and you will be satisfied. Those who prefer to see a new take on an old genre best look elsewhere.




No Country for Old Men


I wanted to try and write a full review of this film, but I just don't feel like I've been able to digest it the way I should have. Clearly this is a very ambitious film, and the Coen brothers have rarely stumbled in their long career. Yet for some reason I felt distanced from this film throughout. What frustrates me is that I can't pinpoint what it is I found so alienating about this film. Tommy Lee Jones as a weary cop is stoic and melancholy, a man who has seen the horrors of the world and walked away dumbfounded. Javier Bardem as the psychopath Chigurh is chilling, one of the best villainous performances in recent years. And capping off his comeback year, Josh Brolin centers the film with his portrayal of a conflicted man on the run. It's interesting that no character here is meant to really be liked or sympathized with, perhaps aiding my conflicted feelings towards this film. Everything is shot with bravado, the sound is beautiful, the lack of any real score adds tension. In fact, the only thing that I can immediately point out as being a misstep is a jumpcut towards the end of the film that essentially skips one of the most important parts of the story. We spend so much time with Brolin's character that it feels like an outright cheat to not see how he gets to where he is at the ending, even if we can piece it together on our own. I wanted to love this movie, and I see no reason why I didn't, which makes this such a maddening experience. This isn't your typical quirky, offbeat Coen brothers movie, instead feeling cold and calculated - and perhaps that is what threw me off. In a way it surprisingly feels more like a Stanley Kubrick film than a Coen brothers film. Kubrick is a man who rarely made a movie I outright loved upon initial viewing, and yet I now consider most of his films to be among the best cinema has every produced. No Country for Old Men is not a film that I can fully dissect right now, but given time it might become a classic - or its coldness might just put me off to it for good. It's simply too soon to tell.